![]() ![]() Carrying WeightĪt 14.1 ounces the Barnes and Noble’s device is heavier than many other e-readers. Keep in mind, the Silk empowered browser speeds up Amazon’s Fire applications significantly the more you use the tablet. ![]() With nearly double the raw device speed, the B&N device ranks higher. On the other hand, Amazon’s tablet has a 1 GHz Texas Instruments, OMAP 4430 (dual-core) processor with 512 MB RAM. The B&N device has a 1 GHz Texas Instruments, OMAP4 (dual-core) processor with 1 GB RAM. The Fire device supplies 8 hours of studying/reading or 7.5 hours of watching films per battery charge. Nook’s battery life is either 11.5 hours of studying/reading or 9 hours of watching motion pictures per charge. ![]() At first view, it’s a draw! Looking past the surface, you’ll find considerable differences… Battery life Both the Nook Tablet and Kindle Fire have a 7″ touchscreen display with the exact same picture quality. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |